Ongoing Sewage Problems In Nixonville
Posted by: John Hancock | 8:20am | Permalink
If you’re reading this, you’re probably familiar with Jay Nixon’s self-inflicted conflict-of-interest in the Ameren-Taum Sauk case. While that conflict has been getting well-deserved headlines, another, which Nixon was warned about 15 years ago, has found its way into court.
The self-described “fervent environmentalist”1 Nixon faces an image problem due to his ties to an embattled sewage plant—operated by Central Jefferson County Utilities Inc.— and the nearby residential development it has affected—Raintree Plantation. Both the plant and the Raintree developer—Raintree Plantation Inc.—are located in Nixon’s home county (Jefferson County) and are owned by his father and other long-time political supporters.2
Since Nixon first ran for AG, family business interests have loaned over $100,000 to his committees, and associated individual and corporate donors have accounted for thousands of dollars in additional support.3 Both Democrat and Republican critics have noted Nixon’s past employment with Raintree, his former residence in the development, and the key financial role family business interests have played throughout his political career.4
As AG, Nixon has largely ignored mounting environmental problems at the sewage plant while pursuing an image depicted in the campaign photo above. In 2005, Nixon altered his negligent course and, instead, tried to cut-and-run from the politically problematic plant. When the Post-Dispatch ran a story in December 2005 entitled “Nixon’s Tie to Firm Mucks Up Image”, Nixon, who had already outsourced the state’s legal work in the plant case, “was unavailable to comment.”5 The story focused on Nixon’s ties to the plant and the plant’s environmental problems, which included “illegal sludge discharges” into a nearby creek. Such problems have drawn the ire of the EPA, DNR, disgruntled local residents and Democrat Rep. Belinda Harris, who pleaded with Nixon to do something for residents affected in his home county.
Rep. Belinda Harris: "I know we can't control everything our family does, but I feel that it is his [Nixon’s] father and I would appreciate it if somehow he could maybe help him understand that this is a very important issue and it needs to be rectified.” 5
Unfortunately for Nixon, the December 2005 story did not end his sewage problem. Last month, the Missouri PSC “approved the transfer of the water and sewer system assets” of the plant to the Jefferson County Public Sewer District as a result of the plant’s failure to “provide safe and adequate water and sewer service.” Plant failures also were a factor in the PSC’s decision to sue Central Jefferson County Utilities for multiple environmental-related violations.6 The PSC has filed suit in Cole County.
It’s times like these when Nixon must wonder why he failed to heed Democrat Mike Wolff's advice 15 years ago:
"The least Missourians can expect from their hard-earned tax dollars is an attorney general who practices what he preaches. If Nixon intends to, as he says, `prosecute polluters who are threatening the health and safety of our children and families,' then it seems he's got his work cut out for him not too far from his breakfast table." 7
Click here for photos of a creek affected by the sewage plant. Photos were taken by Missouri Department of Natural Resources staff in 2004.
______________
1 Post-Dispatch, November 24, 1991
2 Missouri PSC, Hearing Transcript, Norville Kenneth McClain, Jr. testimony, December 20, 2006
3 MEC, FEC campaign finance reports, 1986-2006
4 Post-Dispatch, October 4, 1991
5 Post-Dispatch, December 12, 2005
6 MO Public Service Commission, Release, February 9, 2007
7 Kansas City Star, October 4, 1991